The McGucken Principles, Postulates, Equations, and Proofs: An Examination of Light Time Dimension Theory

Executive Summary

Light Time Dimension (LTD) Theory, proposed by Dr. Elliot McGucken, presents a foundational physical model aiming to unify two cornerstones of modern physics: Einstein’s relativity and quantum mechanics. This ambitious theoretical framework is predicated on a singular, central premise: the dynamic behavior of a fourth expanding dimension.¹ The theory is positioned as a “simple, foundational theory” that seeks to offer a more intuitive and physically grounded alternative to other complex theoretical constructs, such as string theory, which McGucken refers to as a “stringy swamp”.¹ This emphasis on a physical model suggests a deliberate effort to re-physicalize fundamental concepts in physics, moving away from purely abstract mathematical frameworks.

Dr. Elliot McGucken is identified as an award-winning physicist whose academic journey included studies at Princeton University. His Ph.D. dissertation focused on an artificial retina prosthesis, demonstrating a practical application of his physics expertise.⁴ A notable commendation for McGucken’s intellectual prowess comes from the late John Archibald Wheeler, a highly respected Princeton physicist, who reportedly praised McGucken’s exceptional “intellectual curiosity, versatility and yen for physics,” considering him a “top bet”.³ The consistent and prominent inclusion of Wheeler’s statement in descriptions of McGucken’s work serves to lend substantial academic weight to the theory. This approach can be seen as a method to establish the theory’s standing through a form of intellectual lineage, particularly in the context of discussions that may not yet be widely published in traditional top-tier physics journals.

The conceptual core of LTD Theory revolves around three interconnected components: the “McGucken Principle,” the “McGucken Postulate,” and the “McGucken Equation.” All three are fundamentally linked to the concept of a fourth dimension expanding at the velocity of light.¹ A central claim of LTD Theory is its ability to supersede Einstein’s original two postulates of relativity. McGucken proposes that his framework offers a “simpler, more foundational principle of nature” from which all of relativity can naturally emerge.¹ The consistent and emphatic description of LTD Theory as a “physical” theory, often contrasted with what McGucken perceives as less physical or more abstract contemporary theories like “string theory press releases” or “inflation, and multiverse mania,” indicates a deliberate philosophical stance.¹ This framing suggests that the theory not only proposes new scientific ideas but also advocates for an epistemological approach to physics that prioritizes intuitive, tangible, and empirically grounded mechanisms over purely mathematical constructs or highly speculative hypotheses. This positioning implicitly critiques current theoretical physics paradigms that are sometimes perceived as abstract or untestable, aiming to foster a return to a more “physical” understanding of the universe, reminiscent of classical physics.

The foundational elements of Light Time Dimension Theory are summarized in the table below:

Term	Definition
McGucken Principle	The Fourth Dimension is Expanding at the Velocity of Light C: dx4/dt=ic 1

I. The McGucken Principle: The Expanding Fourth Dimension

The central tenet of Dr. Elliot McGucken’s Light Time Dimension (LTD) Theory is encapsulated in the “McGucken Principle.” This principle is explicitly defined as: “THE FOURTH DIMENSION IS EXPANDING AT THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT C: dx4/dt=ic”.¹ This statement posits that the fourth dimension, typically denoted as

x4 in spacetime formulations, is not a static coordinate but rather a dynamically expanding entity. This expansion occurs relative to the familiar three spatial dimensions (length, width, height).¹ A critical aspect of this principle is that the rate of this expansion is precisely the speed of light, denoted by ‘c’.¹

The McGucken Principle is presented as a “simple, foundational postulate and equation” designed to achieve a grand unification in physics: bringing together relativity and quantum mechanics under a single, coherent framework.¹ A significant claim is that this principle is so fundamental that it can replace Einstein’s original two postulates of special relativity, offering a “simpler, more foundational principle of nature” from which all relativistic phenomena can be derived.¹ The expansion of the fourth dimension is proposed as the underlying “physical mechanism” responsible for a wide array of phenomena that have historically been challenging to reconcile. These include quantum nonlocality, entanglement, the unidirectional flow of time (time’s arrows), and the second law of thermodynamics.¹ The concept of the “McGucken Sphere” is introduced as a visual representation of this expansion: a photon remains fixed in its position within the fourth dimension (x4) while the dimension itself expands, thereby illustrating the dynamic nature of x4.⁵

A crucial conceptual reinterpretation within LTD Theory concerns the nature of Minkowski spacetime. Standard physics, particularly special relativity, utilizes Minkowski spacetime where time is treated as the fourth dimension, often represented as ict. McGucken’s theory makes an explicit and critical distinction: “The fourth dimension is not time, but ict”.¹⁵ Furthermore, it is asserted that the established

x4=ict “naturally impl[ies] dx4/dt=ic”.¹ This represents a reinterpretation of a mathematical relationship that, according to McGucken, was historically “largely dismissed as having no

physical meaning”.¹ This reinterpretation is a core conceptual innovation of LTD Theory. Instead of time

being the fourth dimension, the theory posits time as an emergent phenomenon that results from the physical expansion of this fourth dimension (x4) relative to the three spatial dimensions.³ This dynamic view of x4, contrasting with a static coordinate, aims to resolve perceived “un-resolvable paradoxes and confusion regarding time’s physical nature” ¹⁵ and challenges the traditional “block universe” interpretation of spacetime, which often implies a static, predetermined reality. This shift from a static mathematical coordinate to a dynamic physical entity is central to McGucken’s emphasis on a “physical model.”

The theory’s presentation often includes a strong rhetorical framing, positioning its proposition as “a hitherto unrecognized motion, such as the motion of the fourth dimension relative to the three spatial dimensions, is a most dangerous and rebellious thing”.⁸ This narrative draws a parallel to historical figures like Galileo, who was “persecuted for stating that the earth moves around the sun”.⁸ This consistent narrative serves a strategic purpose. It positions McGucken’s theory as a revolutionary idea that challenges established scientific orthodoxy, akin to historical paradigm shifts. By invoking the image of a “dangerous and rebellious” truth-teller, it attempts to preemptively address potential resistance or lack of widespread acceptance from the mainstream scientific community. This approach seeks to frame any skepticism not as a flaw in the theory itself, but as an expected reaction to a groundbreaking, unconventional idea, thereby creating a compelling, almost heroic, narrative around the theory’s development and its proponent.

II. Postulates of Light Time Dimension Theory

The foundational postulates upon which LTD Theory is built provide the logical underpinnings for its central principle. While the “McGucken Principle” describes the expansion itself, the “McGucken Postulate” offers a causal explanation for a fundamental constant of the universe. The primary and overarching postulate of LTD Theory states: “The constancy of the velocity of light c is set via the expansion of the fourth dimension”.¹ This postulate directly addresses one of the most fundamental constants in physics, proposing that its value is not arbitrary but is mechanistically determined by the dynamics of the fourth dimension. This is presented as a more fundamental and explanatory basis for light’s constant speed compared to Einstein’s original postulates of special relativity.¹ It aims to provide a deeper physical reason for ‘c’ being a universal constant, moving beyond its empirical observation to a causal explanation rooted in spacetime dynamics.

The distinction between the “McGucken Principle” and the “McGucken Postulate” is important for understanding the internal logical architecture of LTD Theory. The “Principle” describes a dynamic reality—the expansion of the fourth dimension at ‘c’. The “Postulate,” conversely, describes the consequence of that reality on a fundamental physical constant, asserting that the expansion sets the constancy of the speed of light. This implies a deeper explanatory ambition: the theory seeks not just to describe what happens (the expansion) but also to explain why a fundamental constant like ‘c’ has its specific value, grounding it in the dynamics of the fourth dimension. This approach attempts to provide a more fundamental explanation for ‘c’ than merely stating its constancy.

Beyond this overarching postulate, the various “proofs” offered for LTD Theory’s principle are constructed upon a series of more granular postulates or foundational assumptions.¹ These are presented as logical steps leading to the core principle. One such assumption is that the magnitude of the velocity of every object through the four dimensions of spacetime is ‘c’ (the speed of light).¹ This implies that all entities, regardless of their spatial motion, maintain a constant total velocity through the four-dimensional fabric of spacetime.

Another key postulate is that the faster an object moves through the three spatial dimensions, the slower it must move through the fourth dimension.¹ This establishes an inverse, compensatory relationship between an object’s motion in familiar space and its motion (or lack thereof) in the fourth dimension, ensuring the constant total velocity ‘c’. As a direct logical consequence, if an object’s velocity approaches ‘c’ through the three spatial dimensions, its velocity component through the fourth dimension must necessarily approach zero.¹ Therefore, light (photons), which always travels at ‘c’ in spatial dimensions, is postulated to remain stationary in the fourth dimension (x4).¹

These postulates, particularly those outlining the inverse relationship between spatial velocity and velocity through the fourth dimension, provide a direct physical basis for phenomena like time dilation and length contraction. If the total velocity through spacetime is constant at ‘c’, then any increase in motion through the three spatial dimensions must be compensated by a corresponding decrease in motion through the fourth dimension. This approach aims to make abstract relativistic effects more intuitively understandable by grounding them in a tangible, albeit unobservable, motion of a fourth dimension. It shifts the explanation from purely mathematical transformations, such as the Lorentz transformations in Special Relativity, to a physical interaction with an expanding dimension. This aligns with McGucken’s broader emphasis on a “physical model” ¹, aiming to provide a more “commonsense” ¹ or mechanistic understanding of spacetime dynamics, potentially appealing to those who find purely mathematical descriptions of modern physics less satisfying.

III. The McGucken Equation: dx4/dt=ic

The core mathematical expression of Light Time Dimension Theory is unequivocally identified as the “McGucken Equation”: dx4/dt=ic.¹ This equation is presented as the direct mathematical representation of the central tenet of the theory: “the expansion of the Fourth Dimension at the Velocity of Light”.¹ In this expression,

x4 denotes the fourth dimension, t represents time, c is the speed of light, and i is the imaginary unit (√-1). The inclusion of i is consistent with the mathematical framework of Minkowski spacetime, where the time coordinate is often expressed as ict to ensure the correct metric signature.¹

The equation dx4/dt=ic is posited as the foundational mathematical element from which “all of relativity” and the spacetime metric can be derived.¹ This implies that the entire framework of special relativity can be constructed from this single dynamic principle. It is described as the “simple, physical model common to light, time, the quantum, and relativity” ¹, suggesting its universal applicability across different domains of physics. The theory highlights the “simplicity of its premises” (dx4/dt=ic) as a key indicator of its impressiveness. McGucken, quoting Einstein, argues that a truly impressive theory is one that achieves broad unification from simple premises, relating “different kinds of things” such as quantum mechanics, relativity, time’s arrows, entanglement, nonlocality, and the second law of thermodynamics.⁸ This aligns the theory with a classical ideal of scientific elegance and parsimony.

The presence of the imaginary unit ‘i’ in dx4/dt=ic is a direct consequence of its origin in Minkowski spacetime’s x4=ict. In conventional physics, ‘i’ serves as a mathematical convention that distinguishes the time dimension from spatial dimensions, leading to a hyperbolic (Lorentzian) rather than Euclidean metric for spacetime intervals. However, McGucken’s theory interprets dx4/dt=ic as a physical expansion. This raises a fundamental question regarding the physical manifestation of a velocity component with an imaginary unit. One observation within the provided material directly poses this challenge: “But if we write dx4/dt = ic, aren’t we writing di(s/t * t}/dt = is/t? Then what is ‘i*s’ if not 1.414…? If it is 1.414 then ic is > c, correct?”.¹⁵ This point indicates a need for a more detailed explanation within the theory of how this mathematical property translates into a physical reality, especially given the direct question raised. Such clarification would be essential for the theory to gain wider acceptance in the physics community.

The frequent citation of Albert Einstein’s views on theory evaluation, emphasizing that “A theory is the more impressive the greater the simplicity of its premises is (dx4/dt=ic), the more different kinds of things it relates… and the more extended is its area of applicability” ⁸, is a significant rhetorical strategy. Additionally, the theory quotes Einstein’s belief that physical theories “ought to lend themselves to so simple a description that even a child could understand them”.¹¹ This recurring emphasis on simplicity positions it not merely as a desirable attribute but as an intrinsic indicator of a theory’s fundamental truth and elegance. By presenting

dx4/dt=ic as a remarkably simple and broadly unifying premise, the theory attempts to elevate its perceived validity and appeal, tapping into the scientific ideal of parsimony (Occam’s Razor). However, in the highly complex and often counter-intuitive realms of quantum mechanics and general relativity, true simplicity can be elusive, and oversimplification might obscure critical details. This strategic emphasis on simplicity is likely aimed at making the theory more accessible and appealing to a broader audience, while also subtly critiquing more complex, less intuitive theories.

IV. Proofs of Light Time Dimension Theory

Dr. McGucken offers multiple arguments to support his Light Time Dimension Theory, which he refers to as “proofs.” These arguments systematically outline the logical steps and their foundations. It is important to note that, in the context of theoretical physics, the term “proof” typically refers to rigorous mathematical derivations from established axioms or compelling empirical evidence. The arguments presented by McGucken, while internally consistent given their initial premises, are more accurately characterized as derivations or internal consistency arguments within the LTD framework, demonstrating how the theory’s components logically connect. They are not independent validations that would necessarily convince a skeptical mainstream scientific community without further empirical backing or integration into broader established frameworks.

Proof #1: Based on Light’s Behavior (Logical Deduction)

This argument is a step-by-step logical deduction, consistently referred to as “PROOF OF LTD THEORY’S PRINCIPLE”.¹ It proceeds as follows:

1. Constant Total Velocity in Spacetime: The fundamental premise is that the magnitude of the velocity of every object through the four dimensions of spacetime is ‘c’ (the speed of light).¹ This posits a constant total velocity vector in 4D spacetime for all entities.
2. Inverse Relationship between Spatial and Fourth Dimension Velocity: It is posited that the faster an object moves through the three spatial dimensions, the slower it must move through the fourth dimension.¹ This establishes a compensatory relationship, ensuring the constant total velocity ‘c’.
3. Light’s Velocity in the Fourth Dimension Approaches Zero: As a logical extension, if an object’s velocity approaches ‘c’ through the three spatial dimensions, its velocity component through the fourth dimension must necessarily approach zero.¹
4. Light Stationary in the Fourth Dimension: Therefore, light (photons), which always travels at ‘c’ in spatial dimensions, remains stationary in the fourth dimension (x4).¹ The “McGucken Sphere” is used as an illustrative model: a photon stays in the same place in x4 as the sphere (representing x4) expands.⁵
5. Photons Track x4: This leads to the conclusion that photons of light effectively “track and trace the movement and character of x4”.¹
6. Expansion of x4 Implied: Finally, since light is understood as a spherically-symmetric, probabilistic wavefront expanding at ‘c’ (as in quantum mechanics), it logically follows that x4 itself expands at the rate of ‘c’ in a spherically-symmetric manner. This expansion is also posited to be responsible for “distributing locality into nonlocality”.¹ The argument concludes with QED (Quod Erat Demonstrandum).⁸

Proof #2: Derivation from Einstein/Minkowski

This argument is presented as a direct derivation from established physics: “Einstein/Minkowski wrote x4=ict, naturally implying dx4/dt=ic”.¹ The theory emphasizes that while the equation

x4=ict, a cornerstone of Minkowski spacetime, was realized in the early 1900s, it was “remarkably… largely dismissed as having no physical meaning”.¹ McGucken’s work, therefore, claims to provide this crucial physical interpretation, asserting that

dx4/dt=ic represents a physical expansion of the fourth dimension. This highlights a deeper philosophical motivation behind LTD Theory: a dissatisfaction with purely abstract mathematical descriptions of physical reality. The theory seeks to imbue mathematical formalisms with concrete, intuitive physical interpretations. By proposing a dynamic, expanding fourth dimension as the “physical meaning” of x4=ict, it attempts to provide a more satisfying and comprehensible understanding of spacetime, moving beyond a purely descriptive mathematical model to a mechanistic, causal explanation. This aligns with the theory’s broader emphasis on a “physical model” and reflects a desire for a more intuitive, perhaps even classical, understanding of fundamental physics.

Proof #3: Interrelation of Velocities (Moving Dimensions Theory – MDT)

This argument is mentioned in the context of “Moving Dimensions Theory” (MDT), which appears to be an earlier name or a closely related concept to LTD Theory.¹⁴ It presents a reciprocal relationship between motion in spatial and fourth dimensions:

1. Condition for Spatial Stationarity: The only way for an object to remain stationary in the three spatial dimensions is for it to move at velocity ‘c’ through the fourth dimension.¹⁴
2. Condition for Fourth Dimension Stationarity: Conversely, the only way for an object to remain stationary in the fourth dimension is for it to move at velocity ‘c’ through the three spatial dimensions.¹⁴
3. Conclusion: Relative Motion of Dimensions: Therefore, the fourth dimension is inherently moving at ‘c’ relative to the three spatial dimensions.¹⁴

A concise “twitter proof” (limited to 140 characters) summarizes the core idea: “SR: photon is stationary in 4th dimension. QM: photon is probability wave expanding @ c. Ergo: 4th dimension expands @ c & MDT: dx4/dt=ic”.¹⁴

The different arguments supporting LTD Theory’s principle are summarized in the table below:

| Proof Type | Key Steps/Arguments |

| :— | :— | | Proof #1: Based on Light’s Behavior (Logical Deduction) | 1. Magnitude of velocity for all objects through 4D spacetime is ‘c’. 2. Spatial velocity is inversely related to 4D velocity. 3. As spatial velocity approaches ‘c’, 4D velocity approaches zero. 4. Light remains stationary in x4. 5. Photons track and trace x4’s movement. 6. Light’s spherical, probabilistic expansion at ‘c’ implies x4 expands spherically at ‘c’. 1 | Proof #2: Derivation from Einstein/Minkowski | Einstein/Minkowski’s x4=ict naturally implies dx4/dt=ic, providing physical meaning to the equation. 1 | Proof #3: Interrelation of Velocities (Moving Dimensions Theory) | 1. Staying stationary in 3D requires moving at ‘c’ in 4D. 2. Staying stationary in 4D requires moving at ‘c’ in 3D. 3. Therefore, the fourth dimension moves at ‘c’ relative to the three spatial dimensions. 14

V. Unifying Implications of Light Time Dimension Theory

A central and ambitious claim of Light Time Dimension Theory is its ability to serve as a “simple, foundational theory” that can “finally unify relativity and quantum mechanics in a simple, physical model”.¹ This addresses one of the most significant outstanding problems in theoretical physics, which has long sought a coherent framework to reconcile the two domains. The theory purports to derive “all of Einstein’s relativity, both intuitively and mathematically, from LTD Theory’s simple postulate and equation”.¹ Specifically, the expansion of the fourth dimension (dx4/dt=ic) is claimed to naturally give rise to the spacetime metric, and consequently, all aspects of relativity, including phenomena such as time dilation, length contraction, and the equivalence of mass and energy.¹

Furthermore, LTD Theory claims to provide a “simple, natural, physical mechanism for quantum mechanics”.¹ Phenomena such as quantum nonlocality, entanglement, and probability are asserted to “naturally arise from the very same principle” that underpins relativity.¹ The expansion of the fourth dimension is explicitly stated as the “foundational cause of quantum nonlocality and thus its probability,” explaining how a photon can have an equal chance of being found anywhere upon a spherically expanding wavefront at ‘c’.¹ This unified explanation suggests that the seemingly disparate behaviors of the universe at macroscopic (relativistic) and microscopic (quantum) scales stem from a single, underlying dynamic.

LTD Theory also aims to unlock “time’s foundational, unifying secrets” and provide a unified explanation for “time’s arrows and asymmetries across all realms” of physics.³ The theory defines time and its unidirectional flow (its “arrows”) as being determined by “irreversible physical occurrences resting upon and driven by the expansion of the fourth dimension relative to the three spatial dimensions at the rate of c, as given by dx4/dt=ic”.³ The “one-way expansion of the forth dimension” is presented as the singular “foundational asymmetry for time and all its arrows,” directly linking it to the second law of thermodynamics.² This framework proposes that time itself is an “emergent phenomenon” resulting from this expansion, offering an alternative to the “frozen block universe” interpretation of relativity, which McGucken argues denies the reality of time’s flow.³ This provides a physical mechanism for the experience of time’s passage, rather than treating it as merely another spatial dimension.

The second law of thermodynamics, which dictates the constant increase of entropy (disorder) in an isolated system, is also explained as a natural consequence arising from the expansion of the fourth dimension.¹ It is described not merely as a mathematical formula, but as a “foundational, physical law governing the universe” whose origin is explained by LTD Theory.⁴ This connection suggests a deep, physical link between the expansion of spacetime and the fundamental increase in disorder observed in the universe.

Beyond these major unifications, the theory also purports to account for the constant velocity of light, the existence of a maximum velocity (c), and the independence of light’s speed from the source’s velocity.¹⁵ Some statements suggest the theory has implications for understanding dark matter and dark energy, though specific details are not provided within the available information.¹¹ LTD Theory claims to be consistent with the Standard Model of particle physics and all observable physical phenomena.³ The theory’s ambition is to provide a single, elegant framework that explains a vast array of physical phenomena, from the very small to the very large.

The table below summarizes the unifying phenomena that LTD Theory claims to explain:

| Phenomenon | LTD Explanation |

| :— | :— | | Relativity (e.g., spacetime metric, time dilation, length contraction, equivalence of mass and energy) | Derived from the expansion of the fourth dimension (dx4/dt=ic) which naturally gives the spacetime metric and replaces Einstein’s postulates. 1 | Quantum Mechanics (e.g., nonlocality, entanglement, probability, wave-particle duality) | Expansion of x4 is the foundational cause of nonlocality and probability; entanglement arises from the same principle fostering relativity. 1 | Time and its Arrows/Asymmetries | Time is an emergent phenomenon driven by the one-way expansion of the fourth dimension, providing foundational asymmetry. 1 | Second Law of Thermodynamics (Entropy) | Arises from the expansion of the fourth dimension, a foundational physical law. 1

Conclusions

Light Time Dimension Theory, as articulated by Dr. Elliot McGucken, proposes a novel framework for understanding fundamental physics, centered on the dynamic expansion of a fourth dimension at the speed of light, encapsulated by the equation dx4/dt=ic. The theory aims to provide a unified, physical model that reconciles relativity and quantum mechanics, offering mechanistic explanations for phenomena such as time’s unidirectional flow, quantum nonlocality, entanglement, and the second law of thermodynamics.

The theory’s strength lies in its ambition to simplify and unify complex physical concepts under a single, intuitive principle, moving away from purely mathematical abstractions to a more physically grounded understanding of spacetime. The reinterpretation of x4=ict to represent a physical expansion of the fourth dimension is a core conceptual shift, positing time as an emergent phenomenon rather than a static dimension. This approach seeks to resolve long-standing paradoxes and provide a more satisfying causal explanation for observed physical realities.

However, for the theory to gain broader acceptance within the mainstream scientific community, further rigorous development and empirical validation would be essential. The arguments presented as “proofs” are primarily derivations and internal consistency arguments within the LTD framework, rather than independent empirical validations. Additionally, the physical interpretation of the imaginary unit ‘i’ within the context of a physical expansion warrants more detailed clarification to address potential mathematical ambiguities. The theory’s narrative, which frames its propositions as “dangerous and rebellious,” while strategically positioning it as a revolutionary idea, also highlights the challenge of integrating such a departure from established paradigms into the broader scientific discourse. Ultimately, the success of Light Time Dimension Theory in unifying physics will depend on its ability to withstand rigorous scrutiny, provide testable predictions, and offer compelling evidence that extends beyond its current logical derivations.

Works cited

1. THE MCGUCKEN PRINCIPLE: THE FOURTH DIMENSION IS …, accessed June 26, 2025, https://goldennumberratio.medium.com/the-mcgucken-principle-the-fourth-dimension-is-expanding-at-the-velocity-of-light-c-dx4-dt-ic-c0e366a027a7
2. D Dr. Elliot McGucken – FQXi Forum, accessed June 26, 2025, https://forums.fqxi.org/u/dmcgucken
3. The Physics of Time: Time & Its Arrows in Quantum Mechanics, Relativity, The Second Law of Thermodynamics, Entropy, The Twin Paradox, & Cosmology Explained via LTD Theory’s Expanding Fourth Dimension by Elliot McGucken | Goodreads, accessed June 26, 2025, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/36431445-the-physics-of-time
4. Light Time Dimension Theory: The Foundational Physics Unifying Einstein’s Relativity and Quantum Mechanics – Audible, accessed June 26, 2025, https://www.audible.com/pd/Light-Time-Dimension-Theory-The-Foundational-Physics-Unifying-Einsteins-Relativity-and-Quantum-Mechanics-Audiobook/B0D2NKH4V2
5. Dr. Elliot McGucken dx4/dt=ic Light, Time, Dimension Theory – THE …, accessed June 26, 2025, https://elliotmcgucken.home.blog/
6. The Golden Rule: The #1 Rule for Exalting Business, Branding, Art, Dreams, Money, Entrepreneurship, Long-Term Wealth, and Life’s Greater Riches: The Hero’s Odyssey Mythology Code of Honor by Elliot McGucken | Goodreads, accessed June 26, 2025, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/35613658-the-golden-rule
7. McGucken Photo Infringement – Vondran Legal, accessed June 26, 2025, https://www.vondranlegal.com/mcgucken-photo-infringement
8. Einstein’s x4=ict McGucken’s dx4/dt=ic: The Fourth Dimension is Expanding at the Velocity of Light c – YouTube, accessed June 26, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hk9GXDWh4EA
9. MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY: EXALTING … – Amazon S3, accessed June 26, 2025, https://s3.amazonaws.com/fqxi.data/data/forum-attachments/MDT_EINSTEINS_RELATIVTY_SCHRODENGERS_CHARACTERISTIC_TRAIT.pdf
10. goldennumberratio.medium.com, accessed June 26, 2025, https://goldennumberratio.medium.com/the-mcgucken-principle-the-fourth-dimension-is-expanding-at-the-velocity-of-light-c-dx4-dt-ic-c0e366a027a7#:~:text=The%20McGucken%20Equation%20dx4%2Fdt,and%20thus%20All%20of%20Relativity.
11. THE MCGUCKEN PRINCIPLE: THE FOURTH DIMENSION IS EXPANDING AT THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT C: dx4/dt=ic, accessed June 26, 2025, https://goldennumberratio.medium.com/the-mcgucken-principle-the-fourth-dimension-is-expanding-at-the-velocity-of-light-c-dx4-dt-ic-265d50d78b4c
12. THE MCGUCKEN PROOF: THE FOURTH DIMENSION IS EXPANDING AT THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT C: dx4/dt=ic., accessed June 26, 2025, https://goldennumberratio.medium.com/the-mcgucken-proof-the-fourth-dimension-is-expanding-at-the-velocity-of-light-c-dx4-dt-ic-68df637d1233
13. The Physics of Time dx4/dt=ic: The Book: Dr. Elliot McGucken: DJI Mavic 2 Zoom Oregon Coast – YouTube, accessed June 26, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=015BXGo_tIM
14. 1 What is Ultimately Possible in Physics? Physics! A Hero’s Journey with Galileo, Newton, Faraday, Maxwell, Planck, Einstein – Amazon S3, accessed June 26, 2025, https://s3.amazonaws.com/fqxi.data/data/essay-contest-files/McGucken_What_is_Ultimately_8.pdf
15. Time as an Emergent Phenomenon: Traveling Back to the Heroic Age of Physics by Elliot McGucken – FQXi Forum, accessed June 26, 2025, https://forums.fqxi.org/d/238-time-as-an-emergent-phenomenon-traveling-back-to-the-heroic-age-of-physics-by-elliot-mcgucken
16. Four-dimensional space – Wikipedia, accessed June 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-dimensional_space

Where is the Wisdom we have lost in Information? Returning Wheeler’s Honor and Philo-Sophy—the Love of Wisdom—to Physics. by Dr. Elliot McGucken – FQXi Forum, accessed June 26, 2025, https://forums.fqxi.org/d/1879-where-is-the-wisdom-we-have-lost-in-information-returning-wheelers-honor-and-philo-sophy-the-love-of-wisdom-to-physics-by-dr-elliot-mcgucken